/[pcre]/code/trunk/ChangeLog

Diff of /code/trunk/ChangeLog

Parent Directory | Revision Log | View Patch Patch

-revision 622 by ph10,
Mon Jul 18 10:46:51 2011 UTC
+revision 642 by ph10,
Thu Jul 28 18:59:40 2011 UTC
 Line 148 
 Version 8.13 30-Apr-2011
 . Updated RunTest.bat in the distribution to the version supplied by Tom
      Fortmann. This supports explicit test numbers on the command line, and has
      argument validation and error reporting.
+. An instance of \X with an unlimited repeat could fail if at any point the
+     first character it looked at was a mark character.
+. Some minor code refactoring concerning Unicode properties and scripts
+     should reduce the stack requirement of match() slightly.
+. Added the '=' option to pcretest to check the setting of unused capturing
+     slots at the end of the pattern, which are documented as being -1, but are
+     not included in the return count.
+. If \k was not followed by a braced, angle-bracketed, or quoted name, PCRE
+     compiled something random. Now it gives a compile-time error (as does
+     Perl).
+. A *MARK encountered during the processing of a positive assertion is now
+     recorded and passed back (compatible with Perl).
+. If --only-matching or --colour was set on a pcregrep call whose pattern
+     had alternative anchored branches, the search for a second match in a line
+     was done as if at the line start. Thus, for example, /^01|^02/ incorrectly
+     matched the line "0102" twice. The same bug affected patterns that started
+     with a backwards assertion. For example /\b01|\b02/ also matched "0102"
+     twice.
+. Previously, PCRE did not allow quantification of assertions. However, Perl
+     does, and because of capturing effects, quantifying parenthesized
+     assertions may at times be useful. Quantifiers are now allowed for
+     parenthesized assertions.
+. A minor code tidy in pcre_compile() when checking options for \R usage.
+. \g was being checked for fancy things in a character class, when it should
+     just be a literal "g".
+. PCRE was rejecting [:a[:digit:]] whereas Perl was not. It seems that the
+     appearance of a nested POSIX class supersedes an apparent external class.
+     For example, [:a[:digit:]b:] matches "a", "b", ":", or a digit. Also,
+     unescaped square brackets may also appear as part of class names. For
+     example, [:a[:abc]b:] gives unknown class "[:abc]b:]". PCRE now behaves
+     more like Perl.
+. PCRE was giving an error for \N with a braced quantifier such as {1,} (this
+     was because it thought it was \N{name}, which is not supported).
+. Add minix to OS list not supporting the -S option in pcretest.
+. PCRE tries to detect cases of infinite recursion at compile time, but it
+     cannot analyze patterns in sufficient detail to catch mutual recursions
+     such as ((?1))((?2)). There is now a runtime test that gives an error if a
+     subgroup is called recursively as a subpattern for a second time at the
+     same position in the subject string. In previous releases this might have
+     been caught by the recursion limit, or it might have run out of stack.
+. A pattern such as /(?(R)a+|(?R)b)/ is quite safe, as the recursion can
+     happen only once. PCRE was, however incorrectly giving a compile time error
+     "recursive call could loop indefinitely" because it cannot analyze the
+     pattern in sufficient detail. The compile time test no longer happens when
+     PCRE is compiling a conditional subpattern, but actual runaway loops are
+     now caught at runtime (see 39 above).
  Version 8.12 15-Jan-2011

 Legend:



Removed from v.622
 


changed lines


 
Added in v.642
 Legend:



Removed from v.622
 


changed lines


 
Added in v.642
-Removed from v.622
+Added in v.642

webmaster@exim.org	ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.12