--- code/trunk/ChangeLog 2007/08/15 14:20:05 215 +++ code/trunk/ChangeLog 2007/12/07 20:01:16 284 @@ -1,7 +1,167 @@ ChangeLog for PCRE ------------------ -Version 7.3 09-Aug-07 +Version 7.5 12-Nov-07 +--------------------- + +1. Applied a patch from Craig: "This patch makes it possible to 'ignore' + values in parens when parsing an RE using the C++ wrapper." + +2. Negative specials like \S did not work in character classes in UTF-8 mode. + Characters greater than 255 were excluded from the class instead of being + included. + +3. The same bug as (2) above applied to negated POSIX classes such as + [:^space:]. + +4. PCRECPP_STATIC was referenced in pcrecpp_internal.h, but nowhere was it + defined or documented. It seems to have been a typo for PCRE_STATIC, so + I have changed it. + +5. The construct (?&) was not diagnosed as a syntax error (it referenced the + first named subpattern) and a construct such as (?&a) would reference the + first named subpattern whose name started with "a" (in other words, the + length check was missing). Both these problems are fixed. "Subpattern name + expected" is now given for (?&) (a zero-length name), and this patch also + makes it give the same error for \k'' (previously it complained that that + was a reference to a non-existent subpattern). + +6. The erroneous patterns (?+-a) and (?-+a) give different error messages; + this is right because (?- can be followed by option settings as well as by + digits. I have, however, made the messages clearer. + +7. Patterns such as (?(1)a|b) (a pattern that contains fewer subpatterns + than the number used in the conditional) now cause a compile-time error. + This is actually not compatible with Perl, which accepts such patterns, but + treats the conditional as always being FALSE (as PCRE used to), but it + seems to me that giving a diagnostic is better. + +8. Change "alphameric" to the more common word "alphanumeric" in comments + and messages. + +9. Fix two occurrences of "backslash" in comments that should have been + "backspace". + +10. Remove two redundant lines of code that can never be obeyed (their function + was moved elsewhere). + +11. The program that makes PCRE's Unicode character property table had a bug + which caused it to generate incorrect table entries for sequences of + characters that have the same character type, but are in different scripts. + It amalgamated them into a single range, with the script of the first of + them. In other words, some characters were in the wrong script. There were + thirteen such cases, affecting characters in the following ranges: + + U+002b0 - U+002c1 + U+0060c - U+0060d + U+0061e - U+00612 + U+0064b - U+0065e + U+0074d - U+0076d + U+01800 - U+01805 + U+01d00 - U+01d77 + U+01d9b - U+01dbf + U+0200b - U+0200f + U+030fc - U+030fe + U+03260 - U+0327f + U+0fb46 - U+0fbb1 + U+10450 - U+1049d + +12. The -o option (show only the matching part of a line) for pcregrep was not + compatible with GNU grep in that, if there was more than one match in a + line, it showed only the first of them. It now behaves in the same way as + GNU grep. + +13. If the -o and -v options were combined for pcregrep, it printed a blank + line for every non-matching line. GNU grep prints nothing, and pcregrep now + does the same. The return code can be used to tell if there were any + non-matching lines. + +14. The pattern (?=something)(?R) was not being diagnosed as a potentially + infinitely looping recursion. The bug was that positive lookaheads were not + being skipped when checking for a possible empty match (negative lookaheads + and both kinds of lookbehind were skipped). + +15. Fixed two typos in the Windows-only code in pcregrep.c, and moved the + inclusion of to before rather than after the definition of + INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES (patch from David Byron). + + +Version 7.4 21-Sep-07 +--------------------- + +1. Change 7.3/28 was implemented for classes by looking at the bitmap. This + means that a class such as [\s] counted as "explicit reference to CR or + LF". That isn't really right - the whole point of the change was to try to + help when there was an actual mention of one of the two characters. So now + the change happens only if \r or \n (or a literal CR or LF) character is + encountered. + +2. The 32-bit options word was also used for 6 internal flags, but the numbers + of both had grown to the point where there were only 3 bits left. + Fortunately, there was spare space in the data structure, and so I have + moved the internal flags into a new 16-bit field to free up more option + bits. + +3. The appearance of (?J) at the start of a pattern set the DUPNAMES option, + but did not set the internal JCHANGED flag - either of these is enough to + control the way the "get" function works - but the PCRE_INFO_JCHANGED + facility is supposed to tell if (?J) was ever used, so now (?J) at the + start sets both bits. + +4. Added options (at build time, compile time, exec time) to change \R from + matching any Unicode line ending sequence to just matching CR, LF, or CRLF. + +5. doc/pcresyntax.html was missing from the distribution. + +6. Put back the definition of PCRE_ERROR_NULLWSLIMIT, for backward + compatibility, even though it is no longer used. + +7. Added macro for snprintf to pcrecpp_unittest.cc and also for strtoll and + strtoull to pcrecpp.cc to select the available functions in WIN32 when the + windows.h file is present (where different names are used). [This was + reversed later after testing - see 16 below.] + +8. Changed all #include to #include "config.h". There were also + some further cases that I changed to "pcre.h". + +9. When pcregrep was used with the --colour option, it missed the line ending + sequence off the lines that it output. + +10. It was pointed out to me that arrays of string pointers cause lots of + relocations when a shared library is dynamically loaded. A technique of + using a single long string with a table of offsets can drastically reduce + these. I have refactored PCRE in four places to do this. The result is + dramatic: + + Originally: 290 + After changing UCP table: 187 + After changing error message table: 43 + After changing table of "verbs" 36 + After changing table of Posix names 22 + + Thanks to the folks working on Gregex for glib for this insight. + +11. --disable-stack-for-recursion caused compiling to fail unless -enable- + unicode-properties was also set. + +12. Updated the tests so that they work when \R is defaulted to ANYCRLF. + +13. Added checks for ANY and ANYCRLF to pcrecpp.cc where it previously + checked only for CRLF. + +14. Added casts to pcretest.c to avoid compiler warnings. + +15. Added Craig's patch to various pcrecpp modules to avoid compiler warnings. + +16. Added Craig's patch to remove the WINDOWS_H tests, that were not working, + and instead check for _strtoi64 explicitly, and avoid the use of snprintf() + entirely. This removes changes made in 7 above. + +17. The CMake files have been updated, and there is now more information about + building with CMake in the NON-UNIX-USE document. + + +Version 7.3 28-Aug-07 --------------------- 1. In the rejigging of the build system that eventually resulted in 7.1, the @@ -98,17 +258,73 @@ the "low surrogate" sequence 0xD800 to 0xDFFF. Previously, PCRE allowed the full range 0 to 0x7FFFFFFF, as defined by RFC 2279. Internally, it still does: it's just the validity check that is more restrictive. - -16. Inserted checks for integer overflows during escape sequence (backslash) - processing, and also fixed erroneous offset values for syntax errors during - backslash processing. - + +16. Inserted checks for integer overflows during escape sequence (backslash) + processing, and also fixed erroneous offset values for syntax errors during + backslash processing. + 17. Fixed another case of looking too far back in non-UTF-8 mode (cf 12 above) - for patterns like [\PPP\x8a]{1,}\x80 with the subject "A\x80". - + for patterns like [\PPP\x8a]{1,}\x80 with the subject "A\x80". + 18. An unterminated class in a pattern like (?1)\c[ with a "forward reference" caused an overrun. +19. A pattern like (?:[\PPa*]*){8,} which had an "extended class" (one with + something other than just ASCII characters) inside a group that had an + unlimited repeat caused a loop at compile time (while checking to see + whether the group could match an empty string). + +20. Debugging a pattern containing \p or \P could cause a crash. For example, + [\P{Any}] did so. (Error in the code for printing property names.) + +21. An orphan \E inside a character class could cause a crash. + +22. A repeated capturing bracket such as (A)? could cause a wild memory + reference during compilation. + +23. There are several functions in pcre_compile() that scan along a compiled + expression for various reasons (e.g. to see if it's fixed length for look + behind). There were bugs in these functions when a repeated \p or \P was + present in the pattern. These operators have additional parameters compared + with \d, etc, and these were not being taken into account when moving along + the compiled data. Specifically: + + (a) A item such as \p{Yi}{3} in a lookbehind was not treated as fixed + length. + + (b) An item such as \pL+ within a repeated group could cause crashes or + loops. + + (c) A pattern such as \p{Yi}+(\P{Yi}+)(?1) could give an incorrect + "reference to non-existent subpattern" error. + + (d) A pattern like (\P{Yi}{2}\277)? could loop at compile time. + +24. A repeated \S or \W in UTF-8 mode could give wrong answers when multibyte + characters were involved (for example /\S{2}/8g with "A\x{a3}BC"). + +25. Using pcregrep in multiline, inverted mode (-Mv) caused it to loop. + +26. Patterns such as [\P{Yi}A] which include \p or \P and just one other + character were causing crashes (broken optimization). + +27. Patterns such as (\P{Yi}*\277)* (group with possible zero repeat containing + \p or \P) caused a compile-time loop. + +28. More problems have arisen in unanchored patterns when CRLF is a valid line + break. For example, the unstudied pattern [\r\n]A does not match the string + "\r\nA" because change 7.0/46 below moves the current point on by two + characters after failing to match at the start. However, the pattern \nA + *does* match, because it doesn't start till \n, and if [\r\n]A is studied, + the same is true. There doesn't seem any very clean way out of this, but + what I have chosen to do makes the common cases work: PCRE now takes note + of whether there can be an explicit match for \r or \n anywhere in the + pattern, and if so, 7.0/46 no longer applies. As part of this change, + there's a new PCRE_INFO_HASCRORLF option for finding out whether a compiled + pattern has explicit CR or LF references. + +29. Added (*CR) etc for changing newline setting at start of pattern. + Version 7.2 19-Jun-07 ---------------------