--- code/trunk/ChangeLog 2007/07/19 10:38:20 190 +++ code/trunk/ChangeLog 2007/08/15 11:34:14 213 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ ChangeLog for PCRE ------------------ -Version 7.3 05-Jul-07 +Version 7.3 09-Aug-07 --------------------- 1. In the rejigging of the build system that eventually resulted in 7.1, the @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ brackets there is not right, since it causes compilers to look for an installed pcre.h, not the version that is in the source that is being compiled (which of course may be different). I have changed it back to: - + #include "pcre.h" - - I have a vague recollection that the change was concerned with compiling in - different directories, but in the new build system, that is taken care of - by the VPATH setting the Makefile. - + + I have a vague recollection that the change was concerned with compiling in + different directories, but in the new build system, that is taken care of + by the VPATH setting the Makefile. + 2. The pattern .*$ when run in not-DOTALL UTF-8 mode with newline=any failed when the subject happened to end in the byte 0x85 (e.g. if the last character was \x{1ec5}). *Character* 0x85 is one of the "any" newline @@ -23,9 +23,85 @@ of another character. The bug was that, for an unlimited repeat of . in not-DOTALL UTF-8 mode, PCRE was advancing by bytes rather than by characters when looking for a newline. - - 3. A small performance improvement in the DOTALL UTF-8 mode .* case. + 3. A small performance improvement in the DOTALL UTF-8 mode .* case. + + 4. Debugging: adjusted the names of opcodes for different kinds of parentheses + in debug output. + + 5. Arrange to use "%I64d" instead of "%lld" and "%I64u" instead of "%llu" for + long printing in the pcrecpp unittest when running under MinGW. + + 6. ESC_K was left out of the EBCDIC table. + + 7. Change 7.0/38 introduced a new limit on the number of nested non-capturing + parentheses; I made it 1000, which seemed large enough. Unfortunately, the + limit also applies to "virtual nesting" when a pattern is recursive, and in + this case 1000 isn't so big. I have been able to remove this limit at the + expense of backing off one optimization in certain circumstances. Normally, + when pcre_exec() would call its internal match() function recursively and + immediately return the result unconditionally, it uses a "tail recursion" + feature to save stack. However, when a subpattern that can match an empty + string has an unlimited repetition quantifier, it no longer makes this + optimization. That gives it a stack frame in which to save the data for + checking that an empty string has been matched. Previously this was taken + from the 1000-entry workspace that had been reserved. So now there is no + explicit limit, but more stack is used. + + 8. Applied Daniel's patches to solve problems with the import/export magic + syntax that is required for Windows, and which was going wrong for the + pcreposix and pcrecpp parts of the library. These were overlooked when this + problem was solved for the main library. + + 9. There were some crude static tests to avoid integer overflow when computing + the size of patterns that contain repeated groups with explicit upper + limits. As the maximum quantifier is 65535, the maximum group length was + set at 30,000 so that the product of these two numbers did not overflow a + 32-bit integer. However, it turns out that people want to use groups that + are longer than 30,000 bytes (though not repeat them that many times). + Change 7.0/17 (the refactoring of the way the pattern size is computed) has + made it possible to implement the integer overflow checks in a much more + dynamic way, which I have now done. The artificial limitation on group + length has been removed - we now have only the limit on the total length of + the compiled pattern, which depends on the LINK_SIZE setting. + +10. Fixed a bug in the documentation for get/copy named substring when + duplicate names are permitted. If none of the named substrings are set, the + functions return PCRE_ERROR_NOSUBSTRING (7); the doc said they returned an + empty string. + +11. Because Perl interprets \Q...\E at a high level, and ignores orphan \E + instances, patterns such as [\Q\E] or [\E] or even [^\E] cause an error, + because the ] is interpreted as the first data character and the + terminating ] is not found. PCRE has been made compatible with Perl in this + regard. Previously, it interpreted [\Q\E] as an empty class, and [\E] could + cause memory overwriting. + +10. Like Perl, PCRE automatically breaks an unlimited repeat after an empty + string has been matched (to stop an infinite loop). It was not recognizing + a conditional subpattern that could match an empty string if that + subpattern was within another subpattern. For example, it looped when + trying to match (((?(1)X|))*) but it was OK with ((?(1)X|)*) where the + condition was not nested. This bug has been fixed. + +12. A pattern like \X?\d or \P{L}?\d in non-UTF-8 mode could cause a backtrack + past the start of the subject in the presence of bytes with the top bit + set, for example "\x8aBCD". + +13. Added Perl 5.10 experimental backtracking controls (*FAIL), (*F), (*PRUNE), + (*SKIP), (*THEN), (*COMMIT), and (*ACCEPT). + +14. Optimized (?!) to (*FAIL). + +15. Updated the test for a valid UTF-8 string to conform to the later RFC 3629. + This restricts code points to be within the range 0 to 0x10FFFF, excluding + the "low surrogate" sequence 0xD800 to 0xDFFF. Previously, PCRE allowed the + full range 0 to 0x7FFFFFFF, as defined by RFC 2279. Internally, it still + does: it's just the validity check that is more restrictive. + +16. Inserted checks for integer overflows during escape sequence (backslash) + processing, and also fixed erroneous offset values for syntax errors during + backslash processing. Version 7.2 19-Jun-07